Islaam.nl

Islaam.nl Forum

  FAQ FAQ  Doorzoek dit Forum   Kalender   Registreren Registreren  Inloggen Inloggen

Onderwerp geslotenEven Duidelijkheid Insha ALLAH..

 Post Reply Post Reply
Schrijver
Oum Mujahid Bekijk dropdown
Senior Member
Senior Member


Lid geworden: 30 december 2003
Locatie: Netherlands
Online status: Offline
Berichten: 117
Directe link naar dit bericht Onderwerp: Even Duidelijkheid Insha ALLAH..
    Geplaatst op: 09 januari 2004 om 23:16
Fatwa No. : 37272
Fatwa Title : Is Salafi a right appellation?
Fatwa Date : 17 Rajab 1424
Question

How correct is it for a Muslim or a collective of Muslims to, call themselves "Salafi", and only take their information, and advice from those of this group. Rejecting all other Sheiks.

Fatwa

Praise be to Allah, the Lord of the Worlds; and may His blessings and peace be upon our Prophet Muhammad and upon all his Family and Companions.

As a general rule, the Muslim Ummah, brotherhood or nation is a single one with no sects or sub-divisions as described by Allah, The Almighty in the Qur'an: {And verily! This your religion (of Isl�mic Monotheism) is one religion, and I am your Lord, so keep your duty to Me. }[23:52].
Therefore, Muslims should call themselves whatever Allah Has called them. In an authenticated Hadith reported in the Musnad of Imam Ahmad , the Prophet (Sallallahu Alaihi wa Sallam) is quoted as saying: Whoever invites to the call of the pre-Islamic period of ignorance (Jahilyia), shall be thrown in Hell-fire". The companions said: 'Oh, Messenger of Allah even if he fasts and does his prayers'. The Apostle of Allah said: "Yes, even if he fasts and prays, and alleges to be a Muslim. Call the Muslims proper and good names as they are called by Allah, The Almighty that is; the Muslims, the Believers or the Servants of Allah .
However, if some Muslims are distinguished by certain good deeds or achievements, it is permissible to be attributed to them as those who migrated with the Prophet (Sallallahu Alaihi wa Sallam) from Makkah to Medinah are called (Al-Muhajireen), the residents of Medina who welcomed and helped the Prophet (Sallallahu Alaihi wa Sallam) and Muhajireen are called (Al-Ansar) or the Badris, those Muslim combatants who fought with the Prophet (Sallallahu Alaihi wa Sallam) in the Battle of Badr, or the followers of one of the main distinguished scholars or Imams who founded the four schools of Islamic jurisprudence, like Malik , Abu Haneefa , Shafie or Ibn Hanbal , are called Maliki, Hanbali, etc�
By analogy, the Ahl al-Sunnah (the true followers of Sunnah) are called Salafi because they follow the Salaf (good ancestors) who are the companions of the Prophet (Sallallahu Alaihi wa Sallam), their true followers who conveyed the pure religion, and scholars in the best centuries following the death of the Prophet Muhammad (Sallallahu Alaihi wa Sallam). It is permissible for them to be called Salafi so as to be distinguished from those who introduced innovations or Bidah or those who talked evilly about the companions of the Prophet (Sallallahu Alaihi wa Sallam) or those philosophers who made unnecessary mental or semantic interpretations of the Divine attributes of Allah the Almighty.
Therefore, it is not objectionable for a Muslim to bear these names which indicate such affiliation without bigotry and it should not be a hindrance to follow the truth. Any one who follows the creed of the Salaf and their righteous path is authorized to be called Salafi. If he finds the truth with a group of scholars other than his group he is to follow it.
Allah knows best.

Answerer: Fatwa center supervised by Dr. Abdullah Al-faqih
Terug naar boven
Oum Mujahid Bekijk dropdown
Senior Member
Senior Member


Lid geworden: 30 december 2003
Locatie: Netherlands
Online status: Offline
Berichten: 117
Directe link naar dit bericht Geplaatst op: 09 januari 2004 om 23:18
Question :

What is your view of those who differentiate between the Salafis and Ahl al-Sunnah, and who regard the Salafis as a more specific group than Ahl al-Sunnah, and they that the principles of this group are based on the opinions of the group�s shaykhs?

Answer :

This is not correct, because the Ahl al-Sunnah are those who follow the Sahaabah and the path of the Salaf (the early generations of Islam). These are not two distinct groups, and the Salafis are not a more specific group! 

According to the terminology that is well known, the Salaf are the Sahaabah and those who follow their path, and the Ahl al-Sunnah are those who follow the Sunnah of the Messenger (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him). They are the ones concerning whom the hadeeth was reported: �Whoever follows the same path as me and my Companions� (The hadeeth about the saved group).

 Stirring up disputes and conflict on the grounds of names alone is not permissible. Allaah has commanded the believers to be united and has forbidden them to be divided and warned them against that.

 The individual�s aim must be to seek the truth, and when he speaks he should say what is fair and just, and not hate individuals in such a way that his hatred makes him reject the truth that the person is saying, or look for faults in him. He should not come up with things that are ambiguous or far-fetched for that purpose. This is not the way of Ahl al-Sunnah, and the Muslim has to like for his brother what he likes for himself. He must be sincere towards him, and hold love and sincerity in his heart. 


Shaykh �Abd-Allaah al-Ghunaymaan (www.islam-qa.com)

http://63.175.194.25/index.php?ln=eng&ds=qa&lv=brows e&QR=10714&dgn=4
Terug naar boven
Oum Mujahid Bekijk dropdown
Senior Member
Senior Member


Lid geworden: 30 december 2003
Locatie: Netherlands
Online status: Offline
Berichten: 117
Directe link naar dit bericht Geplaatst op: 09 januari 2004 om 23:20
Question :

I have come to know a person who follows the Salafi da�wah and I have read a book about this movement. I believe that the Salafi da�wah is correct and that those who follow it have the sound �aqeedah belief), but there are some matters I want to ask about
How correct is it from an Islamic point of view to use the word �Salafi� and to describe oneself in this way?
If a person says that he is a Salafi, is he praising himself? Is this considered to be dividing the ummah?
If we tell the Sufis that their madhhab is not correct, and that neither the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) or his Companions taught it, they will respond that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) or his Companions did not use the word �Salafi� either, so how should we reply to them?

Answer :

Praise be to Allaah.

We can answer this question with the following points:

  1. Each person is obliged to follow the guidance of the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) and his Companions. This is the way of Ahl al-Sunnah wa�l-Jamaa�ah and the followers of the righteous predecessors (al-salaf al-saalih). Allaah says (interpretation of the meanings):

    �Say (O Muhammad): �This is my way; I invite unto Allaah with sure knowledge, I and whosoever follows me with sure knowledge. And Glorified and Exalted be Allaah (above all that they associate as partners with Him). And I am not of the mushrikeen (polytheists� those who worship others along with Allaah or set up rivals or partners to Allaah).� [Yoosuf 12:108]

    �And whoever contradicts and opposes the Messenger (Muhammad) after the right path has been shown clearly to him, and follows other than the believers� way, We shall keep him in the oath he has chosen, and burn him in Hell � what an evil destination!� [al-Nisa� 4:115]

    Whoever follows the way of the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) belongs to the salaf al-saalih, even if the people call him something else; by the same token, whoever goes against it and deviates from the Sunnah is an innovator, even if he claims to be a Salafi.

  2. If a person calls himself a Salafi to express his gratitude for having been guided to this way, or to clearly distinguish himself from innovation, then this is OK and is allowed in Islam. But if he says it only for the purpose of praising himself, then this is not allowed, because Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning): �� therefore justify not yourselves�� [al-Najm 53:32 � Yusuf �Ali�s translation]. Similarly, it is not allowed if it is said in a spirit of tribalism or sectarianism, because such attitudes are forbidden, as is clear from the following story: Jaabir ibn �Abd-Allaah said: �A man from the Muhaajireen shoved a man from the Ansaar from behind, so each man�s people gathered around him, saying �O Muhaajireen (come and help)!� or �O Ansaar (come and help)!� News of this reached the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) and he said, �Stop this, for it is repulsive.� Then he said, �What is this call of the people of jaahiliyyah? What is this call of the people of jaahiliyyah?�� (Reported by Imaam Ahmad, 14105; the hadeeth is also to be found in al-Saheehayn). The Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) called it the call of the people of jaahiliyyah and described it as repulsive, even though the words �Ansaari� and �Muhaajiri� are Islamic words, the first referring to those who supported Allaah and His Messenger, and the second referring to those who left the land of kufr and migrated to Allaah and His Messenger. Why were they described in this manner? Because in this instance, the words were not used in a permissible fashion; the usage was a sectarian and political one that could have led to fighting between the two groups. The same applies to the word �Salafi�.

  3. If the Ahl al-Sunnah and the salaf draw a line between themselves and the innovators, this is not considered to be dividing the ummah, as those who criticize the use of this word think is the case, but this distancing of oneself has to be done in accordance with the degree of bid�ah � whether it is major or minor � and should be regulated by the overall interests of the Islamic da�wah.

  4. The Sufi claims mentioned in the question are not valid. The denunciation is not merely because of the word �Sufi�, which is a general word that may be applied to things approved of in Islam, such as asceticism (zuhd) and fear of Allaah, or it may be applied to innovations such as monasticism and extremism. Rather the denunciation is because of the various types of shirk, major and minor, that are connected with Sufism and its tareeqahs. The word Tasawwuf (Sufism) now refers to the Sufi tareeqahs and the kinds of innovations they have. Sufism � as is obvious from their books and how Sufis actually are � includes deviant ideas of kufr, such as hulool (incarnation or the belief that the Creator may be indwelling in His creation � exalted be Allaah above what they say), ittihaad (union) and wahdat al-wujood (pantheism or the unity of existence, which is the belief that the Creator and His creation are the same thing, and that everything in existence is Allaah � exalted be Allaah above what they say), and going to extremes in what they say about the awliya�, in addition to their innovations in the matter of acts of worship and awraad (du�aa�s).

  5. The one who is seeking salvation has to work hard to gain beneficial knowledge and do righteous deeds, and he should avoid vain arguments and futile discussions in which there is no benefit.

We ask Allaah to help us and you to follow the truth and act upon it. May Allaah bless our Prophet Muhammad.


Islam Q&A
Sheikh Muhammed Salih Al-Munajjid (www.islam-qa.com)
Terug naar boven
Oum Mujahid Bekijk dropdown
Senior Member
Senior Member


Lid geworden: 30 december 2003
Locatie: Netherlands
Online status: Offline
Berichten: 117
Directe link naar dit bericht Geplaatst op: 09 januari 2004 om 23:28
Author:
Shaikh Saleem Al-Hilaalee
Source:
His book Limaadha Akhtartu al-Manhaj As-Salafee (pg. 36-38)
Translator:
isma'eel alarcon
Produced by:
al-manhaj.com

 

1. Is using the name "Salafee" an innovation?

Some people say: "Calling oneself Salafee is an innovation because during the time of the Messenger SAWS, the Companions did not call themselves by it."

The Answer: The word Salafee did not apply to the time of the Messenger SAWS and his Companions because there was no need for it, since the first Muslims were upon the correct form of Islaam. So there wasn't any need for the word Salafee, since they were naturally upon that (correct) understanding (of Islaam). Similarly, they used to speak the pure form of the Arabic language - free from grammatical mistakes and errors. So the sciences of Nahu, Sarf and Balaagha did not exist until grammatical mistakes appeared. So therefore, when these grammatical errors appeared, the sciences that set guidelines to the language also appeared afterwards.

In the same manner, when there appeared diversions and deviations from the main body of Muslims, the word Salafee began to appear in reaction to those occurrences. And furthermore, the Messenger SAWS gave an indication towards this understanding in the hadeeth that states that the ummah will divide up into sects, by saying: "(The group that is on) That which I and my Companions are upon."

And when the Islamic groups became many and all of them began claiming that they followed the Qur'aan and the Sunnah, the scholars of the ummah took it upon themselves to differentiate it more from the rest. So they called it: Ahlul-Hadeeth and the Salaf.

Because of this, the word Salafee is distinguished from all the other Islaamic groups. This is since it attributes itself to something that guarantees for its adherents that they are upon the correct form of Islaam, and that is: Adhering closely to what the Companions of Allaah's Messenger SAWS were upon - the Muhaajiroon, the Ansaar and those who followed them in goodness. These are the generations of Muslims that have received testimony and affirmation of their excellence.

2. It is said: "Why should we attribute ourselves to the Salaf when Allaah says: "It is He who has named you Muslims since ***ore." [Surah Al-Hajj: 78]

Answer: We will present to the noble reader a short debate that occurred between our Shaikh (i.e. Al-Albaanee), rahimahullaah, and the professor 'Abdul-Haleem Abu Shaqqah, author of the book "The woman's liberation during the time of the Revelation":

The Shaikh said: "If it is said to you 'What is your madh-hab', what will you say?"

He said: I will say: "I am Muslim."

The Shaikh said: "This is not sufficient."

He said: "But Allaah has named us Muslims." And then he recited the verse: "It is He who has named you Muslims since ***ore." [Surah Al-Hajj: 78]

So the Shaikh said: "This is a correct answer - if we were living during the first generation, ***ore the spreading of groups. So if we were to ask any Muslim today, from these groups that we differ with fundamentally in Creed, his response would not be any different from this word, for all of them - the Shi'ee, the Raafidee, the Khaarijee, the Durzee, the Nusairee, the 'Alawee - would say 'I am Muslim.' So this is not sufficient in these days."

He said: "So then I will say: 'I am a Muslim upon the Qur'aan and the Sunnah.'"

So the Shaikh said: "This is also not sufficient."

He said: "Why not?"

The Shaikh said: "Do you find any person from the people we have just used as an example saying: 'I am a Muslim that is not upon the Qur'aan and the Sunnah.' Which person will say that he is not upon the Qur'aan and the Sunnah?" Then the Shaikh began to explain to him the importance of this supplemental phrase, which we have adopted. And it is: The Qur'aan and the Sunnah with the understanding of the Salaf As-Saalih (righteous predecessors).

He said: "So then I am a Muslim on the Qur'aan and the Sunnah with the understanding of the Salaf As-Saalih (righteous predecessors)."

The Shaikh said: "So if someone were to ask you what is your madh-hab, you would tell him that?"

He said: "Yes."

So the Shaikh said: "What do you think if we were to shorten that linguistically, for the best types of speech is that which is short but has a lot of meaning? So let us (just) say: I am a Salafee."

He said: "I could be polite to you and say yes, but my belief is the same as ***ore. Because when people hear that you are a Salafee, the first thing that will come into their minds are occurrences in which they experienced harshness from some of the extremists amongst the Salafees."

The Shaikh said: "Assuming your words were correct, if you said: 'I am a Muslim', will they not think that you are a Shi'ee or a Raafidee or a Durzee or an Isma'eelee, etc.?"

He said: "Possibly, but I would have followed the noble verse: 'It is He who has named you Muslims.'"

So the Shaikh said: "No, my brother! You did not follow the verse because the verse refers to the correct form of Islaam. It is necessary that you speak to the people according to their levels of comprehension - will anyone understand from you that you are a Muslim according to the intended meaning of the verse?

And the things that you warned about just now may be correct or they may not because your mentioning 'harshness' - this can be found in some individuals, but not as a methodology of belief and knowledge. So leave the individuals to the side for we are talking about the methodology. This is since if we were to say: 'Shi'ee' or 'Durzee' or 'Khaarijee' or 'Sufi' or 'Mu'tazilee', these same things that you warned about (i.e. harshness) would appear from them (also)."

So this is not our discussion. We are looking for a name that provides an indication of a person's belief, which he worships Allaah with."

Then the Shaikh said: "Were not all of the Sahaabah Muslims?"

He said: "Of course."

The Shaikh said: "But in spite of this, there was among them those who stole and those who fornicated, but this did not lead any of them to say: 'I am not a Muslim.' Rather, he was a Muslim - a believer in Allaah and His Messenger SAWS as a methodology - however he would contradict his methodology at times, for he was not infallible.

Therefore, may Allaah bless you, we are talking about a word that indicates our belief, our ideas, and our source of reference in our life in that which is related to the affairs of our religion, which we worship Allaah by. And as for this person being harsh and that person being lenient, then that is another matter."

Then the Shaikh said: "I want you to contemplate on this concise word until you no longer persist in (just using) the word Muslim. And you know well that there doesn't exist anyone that will understand what you are intending to say at all, so speak to the people according to their levels of comprehension. And May Allaah bless you for your compliance."

Terug naar boven
Oum Mujahid Bekijk dropdown
Senior Member
Senior Member


Lid geworden: 30 december 2003
Locatie: Netherlands
Online status: Offline
Berichten: 117
Directe link naar dit bericht Geplaatst op: 09 januari 2004 om 23:30

Shaikh Salih al-Fawzaan was asked, "Is Salafiyyah a hizb (party) from amongst the parties. And is ascribing to them (i.e. the Salafis) a blameworthy thing?"

To which he replied, "As-Salafiyyah (i.e. the Salafis) is the Saved Sect, and they are Ahl us-Sunnah wal-Jamaa�ah. It is not a hizb (party) from amongst the various parties, those which are called "parties" today. Rather they are the Jamaa�ah, the Jamaa�ah upon the Sunnah and upon the Deen (religion). They are Ahl us-Sunnah wal-Jamaa�ah. The Messenger (sallallaahu alaihi wasallam) said, "There will not cease to be a group from my Ummah manifest and upon the truth not being harmed by those who forsake them neither by those who oppose them" and he (sallallaahu alaihi wasallam) also said, "And this Ummah will split into seventy-three sects, all of them in the Hellfire but one". They said, which one is this O Messenger of Allaah? He replied, "They are those who are upon what I and my companions are upon today". Hence Salafiyyah is a group of people (i.e. the Salafis) upon the madhhab of the Salaf, upon what the Messenger (sallallaahu alaihi wasallam) and his companions were upon and it is not a hizb from amongst the contemporary groups present today. Rather it is the very old Jamaa�ah, from the time of the Messenger (sallallaahu alaihi wasallam) which inherits (this way) and continues, and which never ceases to be upon the manifest truth until the establishment of the Hour, as he (sallallaahu alaihi wasallam) has informed (us)." (Cassette: "at-Tahdheer min al-Bid�ah" second cassette, delivered as a lecture in Hawtah Sadeer, 1416H).

Shaikh Saalih Aal ash-Shaikh, Minister of Islamic Affairs of Saudi Arabia, stated, "Muslims are of two groups: Salafis and Khalafis. As for the Salafis, then they are the followers of Salaf us-Saalih (first three generations of Muslims). And as for the Khalafis, then they are the followers of the understanding of the Khalaf and they are also called Innovators - since everyone who is not pleased and satisfied with the path of the Salaf us-Saalih, in knowledge and action, understanding and fiqh, then he is a khalafi, an innovator." (Haadhihi Mafaaheemunaa, Chapter on Ascription Salaf and Salafiyyah).

In the verdict of the Permanent Committee, No. 1361 (1/165) there occurs, "Salafiyyah is an ascription to the Salaf, and the Salaf are the Companions of Allaah�s Messenger (sallallaahu alaihi wasallam) and the Imaams of Guidance from the the first three generations (may Allaah be pleased with them), those whose goodness has been testified for by Allaah�s Messenger (sallallaahu alaihi wasallam), "The best of people are my generation, then those who follow after them, then those who follow after them, then there will come a people whose testimony will precede their oath and their oath will precede their testimony." Reported by Imaam Ahmad in his Musnad and also by al-Bukhaari and Muslim. And "the Salafis" (Salafiyyoon) is the plural of "Salafi", which is an ascription to the Salaf, and its meaning has already preceded. And they are the ones who traverse upon the minhaaj of the Salaf, from amongst the followers of the Book and the Sunnah, those who call to them both, and to acting upon them, as a result of which they are from Ahl us-Sunnah wal-Jamaa�ah."

Stated �Abdul-Azeez bin Abdur-Rahmaan Aal as-Sa�ood, "Indeed I am Salafi, my aqidah is Salafiyyah, by whose requirements I traverse upon the Book and the Sunnah". (Stated during the pilgrimage of 1965, �Al-Mushaf was-Sayf� p.135

Terug naar boven
Oum Mujahid Bekijk dropdown
Senior Member
Senior Member


Lid geworden: 30 december 2003
Locatie: Netherlands
Online status: Offline
Berichten: 117
Directe link naar dit bericht Geplaatst op: 09 januari 2004 om 23:35

This doubt was very beatifully answered by Imaam al-Albaani in his discussion with someone on this subject, recorded on the cassette entitled, "I am Salafi", and here is a presentation of the vital parts of it:

Shaikh al-Albaani: "When it is said to you, �What is your madhhab�, what is your reply?"

Questioner: "A Muslim".

Shaikh al-Albaani: "This is not sufficient!".

Questioner: "Allaah has named us Muslims" and he recited the saying of Allaah Most High, "He is the one who has called you Muslims ***orehand." (al-Hajj 22:78)

Shaikh al-Albaani: "This would be a correct answer if we were in the very first times (of Islaam) ***ore the sects had appeared and spread. But if we were to ask, now, any Muslim from any of these sects with which we differ on account of aqeedah, his answer would not be any different to this word. All of them � the Shi�ite Rafidi, the Khaariji, the Nusayri Alawi � would say, "I am a Muslim". Hence, this is not sufficient in these days."

Questioner: "In that case I say, I am a Muslim upon the Book and the Sunnah."

Shaikh al-Albaani: "This is not sufficient either".

Questioner: "Why?"

Shaikh al-Albaani: "Do you find any of those whom we have just mentioned by way of example saying, �I am a Muslim who is not upon the Book and the Sunnah�?" Who is the one who says, �I am not upon the Book and the Sunnah�?"

At this point the Shaikh then began to explain in detail the importance of being upon the Book and the Sunnah in light of the understanding of the Salaf us-Saalih

Questioner: "In that case I am a Muslim upon the Book and the Sunnah with the understanding of the Salaf us-Saalih".

Shaikh al-Albaani: "When a person asks you about your madhhab, is this what you will say to him?"

Questioner: "Yes".

Shaikh al-Albaani: "What is your view that we shorten this phrase in the language, since the best words are those that are few but indicated the desired intent, so we say, �Salafi�?" End of quotation.

Hence, the point is that naming with "Muslim" or "Sunni" is not enough, since everyone will claim that. And Imaam al-Albaani emphasised the importance of the truth being distinguished from the falsehood � from the point of view of the basis of manhaj and aqidah, and that is taking from the Salaf us-Saalih, as opposed to the various sects and groups whose understandings are based upon those of their mentors and leaders and not that of the Salaf, fundamentally.

 

 

 

Terug naar boven
Salah ad Din Bekijk dropdown
Groupie
Groupie


Lid geworden: 04 januari 2004
Online status: Offline
Berichten: 60
Directe link naar dit bericht Geplaatst op: 10 januari 2004 om 05:39

 

Voor iedereen die het standpunt van de 4 rechtsscholen tov de salafisten wilt onderzoeken:

 

http://www.sunnah.org/publication/fajr/fajr.htm

 

http://village.flashnet.it/users/fn034463/maqalat.html

Terug naar boven
harith2 Bekijk dropdown
Senior Member
Senior Member


Lid geworden: 24 december 2003
Online status: Offline
Berichten: 260
Directe link naar dit bericht Geplaatst op: 10 januari 2004 om 10:31

salaam'aleikum

laa haula we la quetta illaa billaaa

ik volg de profeet(saws) en zijn sahaba

jij erkent de soenna niet, wat zit je dan (zogezegd)

de wetscholen te citeren, antwoord maar

hoe kan een niet soenniet soennieten als verdediging (zogezegd) aannemen?????,

 

Terug naar boven
 Post Reply Post Reply

Spring naar forum Forum rechten Bekijk dropdown



Deze pagina is gemaakt in 0.078 seconden.